Silberstein v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Silberstein v. State, 111 So. 350 (Fla. 1927)
93 Fla. 110
PER CURIAM. —

Silberstein v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The information herein charging the obtaining of money from R. Rappaport by false pretense in a land sale transaction does not allege the ownership of the money, Webb v. State, 69 Fla. 697, 68 South. Rep. 943, and the information alleges that the defendant represented that the Green Silver Realty Company was the owner of the land, which company was not the owner of the land, while the instrument signed by R. Rappaport as purchaser, on which the prosecution is predicated, is signed for “Gertrude Estates Corporation” as the owner of the land.

Reversed.

Whiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Meyer Silberstein, Plaintiff in Error, v. the State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Status
Published