Martin v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Florida
Martin v. Wilson, 113 So. 713 (Fla. 1927)
94 Fla. 207
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Ellis, Strum, Brown

Martin v. Wilson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record in this case having been examined and considered by the Court, it is found that the decree herein should be affirmed, except as to that part of the decrée allowing attorney’s fees, which should be reversed, and the costs of the appeal should be taxed against the complainant on authority of the opinion in the case of Kate Havlin Martin et al. v. Rother, decided at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed in part.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Kate Havlin Martin, Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of John H. Havlin, Deceased, Appellant, v. M. D. Wilson, N. S. Wood and J. H. Ware, Trading and Doing Business as Wilson Sheet Metal Works, Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published