Kneeland v. Tampa Northern R. R. Co.
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hudson, Et Vir v. Weiland (Fla. 1942)
- American Optical Corp. v. Spiewak (Fla. 2011)
- American District Electric Protective Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. (Fla. 1937)
- L. B. McLeod Construction Co. v. Cooper (Fla. 1931)
- Keating v. State ex rel. Ausebel (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
- Schreiber v. Baca (N.M. 1954)
- State Ex Rel. West v. Gray (Fla. 1954)
- Florida Industrial Commission v. State Ex Rel. Orange State Oil Co. (Fla. 1945)
- Moses v. Woodward (Fla. 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Addendum
The record in this cause having been considered by this Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 7837, Acts of 1919, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby reversed.
ELLIS, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL, STRUM, BROWN, AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff in error sued the railroad company for injuries which he alleged he had received while attempting to cross the railroad right-of-way at a grade crossing in Brooksville, Florida.
A demurrer was sustained to the declaration. Plaintiff declined to amend and a final judgment was entered against him.
We believe it would be of no assistance to copy the declaration in this opinion. When a declaration states a cause of action, surplus allegations not eliminated by appropriate motion may be disregarded. Stinson v. Prevatt,
While the declaration contains surplusage, it does state a cause of action.
Reversed. *Page 704
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.