Roughan v. Loftus

Supreme Court of Florida
Roughan v. Loftus, 117 So. 718 (Fla. 1928)
96 Fla. 142
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford

Roughan v. Loftus

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *143 the respective parties, and. the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given m the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in'the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the saíne is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J: J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
M. J. Roughan, Elizabeth M. Severance, and Guy L. Severance, Appellants, v. Patrick J. Loftus and Gertrude I. Loftus, His Wife, Appellees
Status
Published