Interurban Co. v. City of St. Petersburg
Supreme Court of Florida
Interurban Co. v. City of St. Petersburg, 116 So. 876 (Fla. 1928)
95 Fla. 971
Buford, Terrell, Whitfield
Interurban Co. v. City of St. Petersburg
Opinion of the Court
This cause having- heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen- and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The Interurban Company, a Florida Corporation, Nina McAdoo, a Married Woman, Joined by Her Husband, W. D. McAdoo, and Nina McAdoo, Trustee, Appellants, v. City of St. Petersburg, a Municipal Corporation, R. S. Pearce, Mayor-Commissioner; C. L. Snyder, D. S. Pooser, C. M. Blanc, Scott Serviss, R. C. Purvis, and Earle Renwich, Commissioners; S. S. Martin, Director of Finance, and Ernest Kitchen, Director of Public Works of the City of St. Petersburg; And Richardson Construction Company, a Corporation, Appellees
- Status
- Published