Supreme Court of Florida, 1928

Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 5, 1928 · Brown, Buford, Ellis, Strum, Terrell, Whitfield

116 So. 870; 95 Fla. 596 (Southern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The amended declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore, the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621; Pero v. Corley, 87 Fla. 448, 100 South. Rep. 748; Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co., 86 Fla. 338, 98 South. Rep. 75; McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 South. Rep. 28; Cummings Mach. Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 South. Rep. 100; Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties, 93 *597 Fla. 670, 112 South. Rep. 61; Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co., 93 Fla. 503, 112 South Rep. 50.

The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Brown, J., disqualified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.