Utterback v. Young

Supreme Court of Florida
Utterback v. Young, 116 So. 479 (Fla. 1928)
95 Fla. 485
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford

Utterback v. Young

Opinion of the Court

*486 Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein,, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by' the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and. the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert L. Utterback and Roberta F. Utterback, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph W. Young, Walter Hoff Seely, Hollywood Land & Water Company, a Corporation, and Homeseekers Realty Company, a Corporation, Defendants in Error
Status
Published