In this case Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Strum are of opinion that the decree rendered by the trial court from which this appeal was taken should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Wi-iitfield, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of ^pinion that said judgment should be reversed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the decree will be affirmed on the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 So. R. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 So. R. 380; and State, ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 So. R. 796; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, 101 S. R. *613 37; Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. 1107, 111 S. R. 110; Cravatt v. Pierson, 93 Fla. 935, 113 S. R. 94.

An order will be entered affirming the decree herein.