Ettinger v. Maas

Supreme Court of Florida
Ettinger v. Maas, 120 So. 334 (Fla. 1929)
97 Fla. 219; 1929 Fla. LEXIS 819
Terrell, Whitfield, Buford

Ettinger v. Maas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In this case the plaintiffs in error were the defendants in the court below and, upon judgment being rendered against them, they sued out writ of error.

Pleas to the declaration (if any were filed) do not appear in the transcript of the record and, therefore, this Court is not advised of the issues presented in the trial of the cause. For this reason the Court is not in position to determine whether or not' reversible error occurred in the trial and judgment. *

When a record is presented in this condition the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

*220 Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Max Ettinger and Federal Realty Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Individually, and Doing Business as Federal Realty Company, Appellants, v. Catherina Maas, Appellee
Status
Published