Thorne v. Lutz

Supreme Court of Florida
Thorne v. Lutz, 124 So. 471 (Fla. 1929)
98 Fla. 933
Whitfield, Strum, Buford

Thorne v. Lutz

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gordon Thorne, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. Leo Lutz, Defendant in Error
Status
Published