Van Huss v. Pigue

Supreme Court of Florida
Van Huss v. Pigue, 123 So. 742 (Fla. 1929)
98 Fla. 396
Terrell, Whitfield, Buford

Van Huss v. Pigue

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record oE the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered,' *397 ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
V. v. Van Huss, by His Guardian, C. v. McClurg, Appellant, v. Charles Pigue, Appellee
Status
Published