Supreme Court of Florida, 1929

Dorsey v. Griffins

Dorsey v. Griffins
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided November 26, 1929 · Brown, Buford, Davis, Ellis, Strum, Terrell, Whitfield
124 So. 750; 98 Fla. 1020 (Southern Reporter)

Dorsey v. Griffins

Addendum

The record in this cause having been considered by the Court, and the foregoing opinion prepared under Chapter 14553, Acts of 1929, adopted by the Court as its opinion, it is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the appeal in this cause should be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, but should be reinstated upon compliance with the terms of Section 4634, Comp. Gen. Laws of Fla.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree.

The words "and copy" are omitted from the certificate *Page 1021 of the clerk attached to the record. The certificate should show that the transcript contains a "true and correct recitaland copy of all such papers and proceedings" that were directed to be included therein by the parties, as provided by rules of court. Special Rule 3, Dees v. Cassels, 54 Fla. 485, 44 So. R. 1013; Clark v. Cochran, 77 Fla. 98, 80 So. R. 745 and cases therein cited.

The case should, therefore, be dismissed, but should be reinstated upon compliance with the terms of Section 4634, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.