Richmond v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Richmond v. State, 123 So. 2 (Fla. 1929)
98 Fla. 114; 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1135
Terrell, Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Buford, Brown

Richmond v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *115 judgment herein, alid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur Brown, J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name
M. Richmond, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published