Supreme Court of Florida, 1930

City of Jacksonville v. Holmes

City of Jacksonville v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided October 4, 1930 · Terrell, Whitpield, Ellis, Brown, Bupord, Strum
130 So. 279; 100 Fla. 812 (Southern Reporter)

City of Jacksonville v. Holmes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen, and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises; it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that if the plaintiff in the court below will enter a remittitur of $500.00 within fifteen days from the filing of the mandate in the court below, as of the date of the judgment, the remainder of the judgment, to-wit, in the sum of $750.00 will be allowed to stand as of the date thereof. Otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitpield, Ellis, Brown and Bupord, J. J., concur. Strum, J., did not participate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.