Hooton v. Adams Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Hooton v. Adams Co., Inc., 130 So. 24 (Fla. 1930)
100 Fla. 726
Terrell, Whitfield, Buford

Hooton v. Adams Co., Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there-is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur..

Reference

Full Case Name
Olive C. Hooton, and Charles L. Runyan, Administrator De Bonis Non Cum Testamento Annexo of the Estate of Reason A. Hooton, Deceased, Complainants, v. Adams Company, Inc., a Corporation; F. W. Furen and Wife, Cola B. Furen, Defendants and Cross Complainants, and Charles L. Runyan and His Wife Marion Runyan, and Gordon B. Hooton, Cross Defendants
Status
Published