Curtis v. Pinski

Supreme Court of Florida
Curtis v. Pinski, 126 So. 304 (Fla. 1930)
99 Fla. 245
Whitfield, Strum, Buford

Curtis v. Pinski

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub *246 mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the' said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield j P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anna M. Curtis, a Widow, Appellant, v. Ethel Pinski, a Single Woman, and Warren B. Parks, as Special Master in Chancery, Appellees
Status
Published