Supreme Court of Florida, 1930

Skipper v. Handley

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided February 19, 1930 · Terrell, Whitfield, Strum, Brown, Ellis, Buford

126 So. 386; 98 Fla. 1256 (Southern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Keys Lobster v. Ocean Divers (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Barnett v. Dollison (Fla. 1936)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The orders herein appealed from were reversed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick, 93 Fla. 114, 111 So. R. 538; Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140, 115 So. R. 527, and not within the rules stated in Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla. 279, 97 So. R. 714; 35 A. L. R. 271; 90 Fla. 621, 106 So. R. 424. It is therefore considered, ordered and de *1257 creed that the former decree herein reversing the orders appealed from is vacated and it is now ordered and decreed that the orders appealed from are hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis and Buford, J. J., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.