Jackson v. Richey Amusement Co.
Jackson v. Richey Amusement Co.
126 So. 746; 99 Fla. 578
(Southern Reporter)
Jackson v. Richey Amusement Co.
Opinion of the Court
This was a suit instituted by a Bill in Chancery to cancel a lease agreement filed by the owner against the lessee.
The alleged lease agreement does not appear in the record as a part of the Bill of Complaint, or otherwise.
There was a demurrer to the bill of complaint which, amongst other grounds, raised the point that there was no equity in the bill. The demurrer was over-ruled.
The Bill of Complaint does not allege sufficient facts as to show the complainant is entitled to relief in a court of equity and, therefore, the demurrer should have been sustained.
The decree appealed from is reversed.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.