State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst
State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst
128 So. 264; 99 Fla. 1027
(Southern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Curcie Bros. v. Caruthers (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
- Lewis & Holmes Motor Freight Corp. v. City of Atlanta (Ga. 1943)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner by mandamus in this Court seeks to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys in good standing before the bar of this State, relying on State v. Kirk, 12 Fla. 278. At the time of State v. Kirk Sections 2554 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats, (now Sections 4172 et seq., Comp. Gen.' Laws of 1927) was not in force. The latter statute providing a more speedy and adequate remedy, the petition for mandamus is denied.
All concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.