Yoemans v. State
Yoemans v. State
134 So. 237; 101 Fla. 551
(Southern Reporter)
Yoemans v. State
Opinion of the Court
On authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Benton vs. The State, 74 Fla. 30, 76 Sou. 341, the writ of certiorari should be quashed. It is so ordered.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
A part of the material evidence on which this man was convicted in the County Court was obtained by an unlawful search of his person. Due objection was made by defendant. I think the admission of this evidence was a “departure from the essential requirements of the law,” and that the Circuit Court should have reversed the judgment of the County Court. See Brinson v. T'harin, 99 Fla. 696, 127 So. 313.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.