Dechman v. Higginbotham Et Vir.

Supreme Court of Florida
Dechman v. Higginbotham Et Vir., 136 So. 232 (Fla. 1931)
102 Fla. 91
Buford, Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Davis, Ellis

Dechman v. Higginbotham Et Vir.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.-

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected,% and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, *92 therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name
A. F. Dechman, and W. W. Hodges, Appellants, vs. Acola Higginbotham, Joined by Her Husband, George S. Higginbotham, Appellees
Status
Published