Seago v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Seago v. State, 132 So. 700 (Fla. 1931)
101 Fla. 815
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford

Seago v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen *816 and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the'said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.'

Reference

Full Case Name
Jim O. Seago, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Status
Published