Haworth v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Haworth v. State, 132 So. 114 (Fla. 1931)
100 Fla. 1629
Whitfield, Strum, Buford

Haworth v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the re.cord of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court *1630 that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joe Haworth and James F. McLaughlin, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Status
Published