Sottile v. Lanford

Supreme Court of Florida
Sottile v. Lanford, 136 So. 604 (Fla. 1931)
102 Fla. 826
Buford, Whitfield, Davis

Sottile v. Lanford

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Louise Sottile, by and Through Her Next Friend and Husband, James Sottile, Appellants, vs. v. W. Lanford and Lethar Lanford, His Wife, Freelund Construction and Supply Company, a Corporation, and Bay Ridge Improvement Company, a Corporation, Appellees
Status
Published