Brintnell v. Eckles Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida February 6, 1931

Brintnell v. Eckles Et Ux., 132 So. 696 (Fla. 1931)

101 Fla. 816

Strum, Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to advance for early consideration and disposition. It does not come within the rule to advance but by its terms it may be treated as a motion to quash. It is so treated and is granted on authority of Norfleet Holding Company vs. Price, filed February 5, 1931.

Strum, C.J., and . Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J.J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: J. B. Brintnell, Appellant, vs. H. T. Eckles and Mary D. Eckles, His Wife, Appellees
Status: Published