Ashcraft v. Flowers

Supreme Court of Florida
Ashcraft v. Flowers, 132 So. 698 (Fla. 1931)
101 Fla. 1013
Buford, Terrell, Whitfield

Ashcraft v. Flowers

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
E. H. Ashcraft, as Receiver of Seminole County Bank, a Banking Corporation, Appellant, vs. C. L. Flowers, A. Kent Rossetter and Wife, Elizabeth Nix Rossetter, Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co., a Corporation, and Truman Fertilizer Co., a Corporation, Appellees
Status
Published