Williams Et Ux. v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Florida May 27, 1931

Williams Et Ux. v. Dunn, 135 So. 139 (Fla. 1931)

101 Fla. 652

Buford, Ellis, Whitfield, Terrell, Davis

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case is from an order granting a motion to strike a part of paragraph 1 and all of paragraph 4 of an answer attempting to set up an affirmative defense to an amended bill to foreclose a mortgage.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Ray vs. Williams, 55 Fla. 723, 46 Sou. 158; Busch vs. Baker, 79 Fla. 113, 83 Sou. 704; and Davis Mercantile Co. vs. Gillette, 82 Fla. 340, 90 Sou. 189, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and'Brown, J.J., concur. Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Reference

Full Case Name: Simon F. Williams and Mary S. Williams, His Wife, Appellants, vs. Joseph R. Dunn, as Receiver of the Peoples Bank of Jacksonville, a Corporation, Appellee
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published