Supreme Court of Florida, 1932

Tomasello, Jr., as Recr. v. Gingras

Tomasello, Jr., as Recr. v. Gingras
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 25, 1932 · PER CURIAM. —
141 So. 880; 105 Fla. 557 (Southern Reporter)

Tomasello, Jr., as Recr. v. Gingras

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. See principles stated and authorities cited in Early v. Richardson, 280 U. S. 496. 30 Sup. Ct. 176, 74 L. Ed. 575, 69 A. L. R. 658.

*558 Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.