Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida
Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp., 139 So. 880 (Fla. 1932)
104 Fla. 399
Koonce

Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Koonce,

Circuit Judge.β€”In this cause all the issues were resolved into a question of fact. The testimony was conflicting. The Circuit Judge heard and considered the testimony. It cannot be said that there was not evidence to support his findings, and in such cases the judgment of the lower court will not be disturbed by the appellate court. There was ample evidence to support the *400 judgment of the chancellor. Therefore the decree of the Circuit Court should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Douglas S. Cramer, as Trustee, Angie S. Avery and W. H. Avery, Her Husband, and Walter Williams, Appellants, Versus Suburban Miami Investment Corporation, Appellee
Status
Published