Supreme Court of Florida, 1933

Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud

Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided October 2, 1933 · Whitfield, Brown, Buford
150 So. 136; 112 Fla. 225 (Southern Reporter)

Partin v. State Bank of St. Cloud

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its1 judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court'that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Concurring Opinion

Buford, J.

(concurring). — The final decree shows on its face that it was entered pursuant to stipulation of counsel and therefore we must assume that material facts not shown to have been proven were by stipulation admitted, — absent the contents of the stipulation appearing in the record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.