Supreme Court of Florida, 1934

Abrogast Land Co. v. Philcox

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided December 31, 1934 · Buford, Whitfield, Brown, Davis, Ellis, Terrell

157 So. 891; 122 Fla. 539; 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1968 (Southern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Gautier v. Town of Crescent City (Fla. 1939)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Buford, J.

The appeal here is from an order vacating a restraining order which had been entered without notice restraining the issuing of a tax deed on a bill of complaint challenging the validity of tax certificates in which it was *540 not alleged that “the property was not subject to taxation, or that the taxes had been paid previous to sale, or that the property had been redeemed prior to the execution and delivery of deed based upon certificate issued for non-payment of taxes,” as required by Chapter 14572, Acts of Extra Session, 1929.

The granting of the restraining order without notice was in contravention of Section 73 of 1931 Chancery Practice Act.

The order appealed from must be affirmed because of the non-compliance with provisions of the legislative Acts, supra, and on authority of the opinion and judgment of this Court in the cases of Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty, 112 Fla. 654, 152 Sou. 439; Lee v. Rooker & Co. Inc., 108 Fla. 534, 146 Sou. 546, and DeVane, et al., v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216, 151 Sou. 530.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.