Supreme Court of Florida, 1935

Yearty, Et Vir. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 24, 1935 · Ellis, Terrell, Buford, Whitfield, Brown, Davis

162 So. 510; 120 Fla. 202 (Southern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision. The 7 that cite it most often are listed here.

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. Of America v. McConnell (5th Cir. 1952)
Kamenesh v. City of Miami (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1991)
Dearing v. Reese (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Jones (5th Cir. 1961)
Baker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (5th Cir. 1954)
Bastine v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co (5th Cir. 1953)
Neel v. Mayo (Fla. 1937)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant, at the beginning of his brief, states:

“1. Broadly it is sought by the appeal to have a reconsideration of the evidence with view. to reversal of the findings • disclosed by the final decree so that the questions for consideration will deal with sufficiency of evidence before the trial court to sustain the Chancellor in his decree.”

*203 There appear nine other paragraphs of questions sought to be presented but the first question above quoted is the controlling factor in each of the other questions stated.

There is' disclosed in the record substantial evidence to support the final decree and, therefore, following the long established rule applicable in such cases, the decree will not be reversed but must be affirmed.

It is so ordered. .

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.