Supreme Court of Florida, 1936

Ramsay v. Ramsay

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 6, 1936 · Whitfield, Brown, Davis, Ellis, Terrell, Buford

168 So. 12; 124 Fla. 266; 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1102 (Southern Reporter)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal from interlocutory orders of Chancery Court entered in a divorce case. The orders appealed from being within the sound discretion of the Chancellor, are affirmed on the authority of Demos v. Walker, 99 Fla. 302, 125 Sou. Rep. 305; Holly v. Holly, 81 Fla. 881, 89 Sou. Rep. 132; Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 Sou. Rep. 896; O’Gara v. Hancock, 76 Fla. 1, 79 Sou. Rep. *267 167; Rausch v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc., 77 Fla. 846, 82 Sou. Rep. 295. No abuse of discretion has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur. Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.