Supreme Court of Florida, 1936

Sholtz v. State ex rel. McMaster

Sholtz v. State ex rel. McMaster
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 9, 1936 · Brown, Buford, Davis, Ellis, Terrell, Whitfield
124 Fla. 267; 169 So. 50

Sholtz v. State ex rel. McMaster

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, con*268sidered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed upon the authority of the Opinion and Judgment of this Court in the case of Sholtz v. State, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, 122 Fla. 249, 165 Sou. Rep. 39.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.