Washington v. State
Washington v. State
185 So. 146; 135 Fla. 100; 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1518
(Southern Reporter)
Washington v. State
Opinion of the Court
I think the record discloses no reversible error. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. The jury were the judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. The trial judge approved the verdict by denying motion for new trial and we should affirm the judgment. *Page 101
TERRELL, C.J., and WHITFIELD, J., concur.
BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., dissent.
THOMAS, J., not participating.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.