Samaritano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida October 31, 1938

Samaritano v. State, 184 So. 927 (Fla. 1938)

134 Fla. 688; 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1167

Ellis, Terrell, Buford, Whitfield, Brown, Chapman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of manslaughter under an indictment charging murder in the first degree.

We have considered all questions and contentions presented by the plaintiff in error and find that each and all of them must be resolved against the plaintiff in error on au *689 thority of the former opinions and judgments of this Court and that no useful purpose may he served by now writing an extended opinion dealing with questions which have been heretofore fully answered and definitely determined.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment should be and is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jack Samaritano, Alias Jake Sam Marition, Alias Jake Sam Samaritano v. State.
Status: Published