Supreme Court of Florida, 1938

Green, Et Ux. v. Parmelee

Green, Et Ux. v. Parmelee
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided October 14, 1938 · Ellis, Terrell, Buford, Whitfield, Brown, Chapman
183 So. 726; 134 Fla. 289 (Southern Reporter)

Green, Et Ux. v. Parmelee

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure of an alleged vendor’s lien.

Defendants were served with process and appeared by counsel in the cause and thereafter suffered decree pro confesso to be entered against them and the cause to proceed ex parte.

The questions attempted to be presented- here may have been of merit had they been presented in due course in the court below. They were not so presented and, therefore, we may not now adjudicate them.

*290 The decree must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J , and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.