Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 1939

Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer

Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided December 5, 1939 · Terrell, Buford, Thomas, Whitfield, Brown, Chapman, Compiled, Laws, Rules
192 So. 402; 140 Fla. 841; 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1212 (Southern Reporter)

Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

The only question presented in this case is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. An examination of the record convinces us there was no reversible error; therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑