Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida
Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville, 187 So. 908 (Fla. 1939)
136 Fla. 847; 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1607
Whitfield, Brown, Chapman, Buford, Terrell, Thomas, Compiled, Laws, Rules

Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel,, and being duly considered by the Court, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record, and it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the order of the court below quashing the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissing the cause, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J., concur. Buford, J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Terrell and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Reference

Full Case Name
W.J. Fouraker v. City of Jacksonville, and William B. Simmons, as Commissioner of Buildings, Also Known as Inspector of Buildings, for Said City.
Status
Published