Ford Motor Co. v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Florida April 21, 1939

Ford Motor Co. v. Floyd, 189 So. 925 (Fla. 1939)

137 Fla. 308; 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1824

Terrell, Buford, Whitfield, Brown, Chapman, Compiled, Laws, Rules

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon authority of the opinion in Ford *309 Motor Company, a corporation, and E. S. DesChamps, Jr., v. Farley F. Floyd, as administrator of the estate of Alice Floyd, decided this term, it is ordered that the judgment s'o far as it relates to E. S. DesChamps, Jr., is hereby affirmed, and as to' the Ford Motor Company is to be reversed; one half of the costs of this proceeding to be borne by the defendant in error and one half by the plaintiff in error, E. S. DesChamps, Jr.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford, J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687 Compiled General Laws of 1927 and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ford Motor Company, and E. S. DesChamps, Jr., v. Farley F. Floyd, as Administrator of the Estate of Ida S. Floyd, Deceased
Status: Published