This case is before us for consideration pursuant to oral argument after rehearing was granted pursuant to our opinion and judgment filed and entered January 5, 1938 (181 So. 179), to allow relators to join issue on affirmative allegations of answer and to take testimony before a commissioner appointed for that purpose.

Plaving considered the record as it now appears, we find the allegations of the answer sufficient and supported by the evidence taken. So the alternative writ is quashed on authority-of our former opinion, supra.

So ordered.