Supreme Court of Florida, 1939

Torreyson v. Dutton

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided June 6, 1939 · Pee, Terrell, Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman', Thomas

190 So. 430; 138 Fla. 873 (Southern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Torreyson, Et Vir v. Dutton (Fla. 1940)
DRL, INC. v. Murphy (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Addison v. Benedict (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
County of Pinellas v. Clearwater Fed. Sav. & L. Ass'n (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Florida Board of Forestry v. Lindsay (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Lee v. Carpenter (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
Gates v. Roberts (Fla. 1956)
Daniell v. Sherrill (Fla. 1950)
Sims v. Palmer (Fla. 1948)
McKinnon v. Bradley (Or. 1945)
Wolfson v. Heins, Et Ux. (Fla. 1942)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.- —

This cause comes on to be heard on motion to modify the judgment entered herein on the 16th day of May, 1939.

The premises considered, it is ordered that the judgment be modified to read,

For the reasons stated, the decree must be reversed with directions that a decree be entered in favor of the complainants, unless it shall be made to appear to the court below that a third party in interest should be allowed to intervene and establish his rights in the rem, in which event the lower court may allow intervention and adjudicate the right between the intervenor and the party prevailing in this appeal.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman' and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.