Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Florida October 6, 1939

Ross v. State, 191 So. 509 (Fla. 1939)

140 Fla. 191; 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1082

Terrell, Buford, Thomas, Chapman, Whitfield, Compiled, Laws, Rules

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

To a judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree, defendant sued out writ of error and, on review, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

The evidence as disclosed by the bill of exceptions has been examined and is found to be amply sufficient to support the judgment.

An examination of the entire record fails to disclose reversible error.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section' 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Reference

Full Case Name: Egvert v. Ross v. State
Status: Published