Supreme Court of Florida, 1939

Jones v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 21, 1939 · Terrell, Buford, Thomas, Whitfield, Brown, Chapman, Compiled, Laws, Rules

190 So. 615; 139 Fla. 400; 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1679 (Southern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Jones v. Mayo (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1949)
Jones v. Mayo (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1949)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Since his conviction of the offense of robbery under Chapter 13792, Acts of 1929, the Petitioner has been before this Court three times. See Jones v. State, 122 Fla. 307, 165 Sou. 33; Jones v. Mayo, 126 Fla. 523, 171 Sou. 312; Jones v. State, 130 Fla. 645, 178 Sou. 404. He now appears here on writ oí error to the Circuit Court for Union County to review the order of that court holding his ‘petition for writ of habeas corpus insufficient and denying the writ. . ■

The record has been examined and the assignments of error are found to be without merit.

So the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as au *401 thorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.