Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Florida, 1940

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 22, 1940 · Terrell, Buford, Thomas, Whitfield, Brown, Chapman, Compiled, Laws, Rules
194 So. 874; 142 Fla. 470; 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1391 (Southern Reporter)

Smith v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On writ of error, we review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of hogs.

The only question presented is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence has been examined and carefully considered. It is conflicting and the jury resolved the conflicts against the accused.

No reversible error is shown. See Hamlin v. State, 80 Fla. 217, 85 Sou. 685; Strobhar v. State, 55 Fla. 167, 47 Sou. 4; Danley v. State, 135 Fla. 28, 184 Sou. 525.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion -and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑