Hornsby v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Hornsby v. State, 200 So. 541 (Fla. 1941)
146 Fla. 23; 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1065
Whitfield, Buford, Chapman, Thomas, Brown, Terrell, Adams

Hornsby v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be—

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Terrell and Adams, J. J., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. A. Hornsby, Appellant, v. State, Appellee
Status
Published