Supreme Court of Florida, 1941

Miami Transit Company v. Hines

Miami Transit Company v. Hines
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 29, 1941 · Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Adams, Brown, Thomas, Chapman
3 So. 2d 724; 148 Fla. 28; 1941 Fla. LEXIS 824 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Miami Transit Company v. Hines

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Thomas, J., dissent. Chapman, J., not participating.

Dissenting Opinion

Thomas, J., dissenting.

I dissent because of the view that instructions requested by the plaintiff, numbers one and five, modified and given by the court, were erroneous and harmful to the defendant.

Brown, J., concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.