Supreme Court of Florida, 1941

Boyd v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Boyd v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided January 31, 1941 · Brown, Whitfield, Buford, Adams
200 So. 399; 146 Fla. 15; 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1061 (Southern Reporter)

Boyd v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

On authority of our opinion and judgment in the case' of C. A. Stephens, et al., v. C. R. Stickel, etc., filed at this term of court we shall consider the entry <pf appeal and the lodging of the record here as an application for interlocutory certiorari under Rule 3.

*16 The order to be reviewed denied motion to dismiss bill of. interpleader, required interpleader between the respondents and enjoined the progress of a suit prosecuted by one of the respondents against the plaintiff insurance company.

The allegations of the bill of complaint .are sufficient to meet the requirements in such cases. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Cancroft, 122 Fla. 10, 164 So. 516.

Certiorari, is denied and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

So ordered.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.