Supreme Court of Florida, 1941

Gilbert v. State

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided October 21, 1941 · Brown, Whitfield, Buford, Adams

4 So. 2d 330; 148 Fla. 293; 1941 Fla. LEXIS 882 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Hogwood v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)
Contreras v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
State v. Wright (Fla. 1969)
York v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Wilson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Owens v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Kimble v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Wright v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Smith v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Farrior v. State (Fla. 1954)
Mooney v. State (Fla. 1954)
Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke (Fla. 1945)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal brings for review judgments of conviction of the offense of unlawfully living in an open state of adultery.

The sole challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.

The record discloses no motion for new trial. Therefore, review of error predicated on insufficiency of evidence is not available. See Schmids v. Tampa Pub. Co., 72 Fla. 571, 73 Sou. 593; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232, 143 Sou. 159; Davis *294 v. State, 47 Fla. 26, 36 Sou. 170; Florida Power Co. v. Cason, 79 Fla. 619, 84 Sou. 921; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville, 86 Fla. 479, 98 Sou. 354; 356, citing Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 83, 95 Sou. 302; Johnson v. State, 53 Fla. 42, 43 Sou. 430; Thomas Bros. Co. v. Price, 56 Fla. 854, 48 Sou. 262.

No reversible error appearing from the record, the judgments are affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.