Violet Van Natta Ide v. City of St. Cloud

Supreme Court of Florida April 30, 1943

Violet Van Natta Ide v. City of St. Cloud, 13 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1943)

152 Fla. 837; 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1043

Buford, Terrell, Brown, Chapman, Adams, Sebring, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

This is the second appearance here of this case. See Ide v. City of St. Cloud, 150 Fla. 806, 8 So. (2nd) 924. After a careful consideration of the record and the arguments and briefs of counsel, our conclusion is that the trial court correctly construed the meaning and effect of our former opinion and mandate in this case and properly applied the same in all of its rulings now brought’before us for review. As the record discloses no error, the judgment is hereby

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. SEBRING, J., agrees and concurs in the conclusion. THOMAS, J., agrees to conclusion only.

Reference

Full Case Name: Violet Van Natta Ide, a Widow v. City of St. Cloud, Florida, a Municipal Corporation.
Status: Published